Stacia Cullors v. Cerebral, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 12, 202423-55594California1,001 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 12 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STACIA CULLORS, an individual; et al., No. 23-55594

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-09143-DSF-PD v.

CEREBRAL, INC., MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 10, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, N.R. SMITH, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Named Plaintiffs Stacia Cullors, Eric Eberle, Maggie Harrison, Nicole

Scurlock Dewey, Mercedes Schroeder, and Patricia Anne Crawford appeal the

district court’s order granting Defendant Cerebral, Inc.’s motion to compel

arbitration for the underlying claims brought in this putative class action.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Reviewing de…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.