Stacia Cullors v. Cerebral, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 12, 202423-55594California1,001 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 12 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STACIA CULLORS, an individual; et al., No. 23-55594
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-09143-DSF-PD v.
CEREBRAL, INC., MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 10, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: GRABER, N.R. SMITH, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Named Plaintiffs Stacia Cullors, Eric Eberle, Maggie Harrison, Nicole
Scurlock Dewey, Mercedes Schroeder, and Patricia Anne Crawford appeal the
district court’s order granting Defendant Cerebral, Inc.’s motion to compel
arbitration for the underlying claims brought in this putative class action.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Reviewing de…