Marc Guisinger v. Keystone Rv Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 12, 202423-55572California738 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUL 12 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

MARC GUISINGER, individually and on No. 23-55572 behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 2:23-cv-01393-JLS-RAO

v.

MEMORANDUM*

KEYSTONE RV COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 10, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, N.R. SMITH, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Keystone RV Company timely appeals the denial of its motion to compel

arbitration, in which it sought to invoke the arbitration provision of a financing

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). agreement between Marc Guisinger and an RV dealership that is not a party to this

suit. We have jurisdiction under 9 U.S.C. § 16, and we affirm.

The district court properly took up…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.