People v. Norcutt CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 12, 2024E082649California1,753 words

Opinion

Opinion

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

On October 6, 2022, an information charged defendant with infliction of corporal

injury resulting in a traumatic condition upon a present or former spouse or cohabitant

under Penal Code1 section 273.5, subdivision (a), a felony (count 1); assault likely to

produce great bodily injury under section 245, subdivision (a)(4), a felony (count 2); and

making criminal threats under section 422, a felony (count 3).

On September 28, 2023, a trial by jury commenced. On October 12, 2023,

defense counsel moved for a judgment of acquittal under section 1118.1. Defense

counsel stated: “Your Honor, at this time I would make an [sic] 1118 motion as to all

three counts.” The prosecutor opposed the motion, stating: “I believe there’s enough

evidence to move forward for the jury to decide all counts.” After the prosecutor set forth

the specific evidence regarding each count, the trial court denied the motion. The court

stated: “The Court has heard the evidence. And after listening to arguments, Counsel,

the Court feels that there is more than enough evidence to allow the jury to make the

decision on all three counts, and your 1118 motion is denied.”

On October…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.