United States v. Adam Livar

Good Law
108 F.4th 738
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 15, 202422-30213California15,081 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-30213

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No.3:21-cr- v. 00031-SI-

ADAM LLOYD LIVAR,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael H. Simon, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 18, 2023 San Francisco, California

Filed July 15, 2024

Before: Lawrence VanDyke and Gabriel P. Sanchez, Circuit Judges, and Kathryn H. Vratil,* District Judge.

Per Curiam Opinion; Concurrence by Judge Vratil; Concurrence and Dissent by Judge VanDyke; Concurrence and Dissent by Judge Sanchez

* The Honorable Kathryn H. Vratil, United States District Judge for the District of Kansas, sitting by designation. SUMMARY**

Criminal Law

The panel vacated Adam Lloyd Livar’s sentence and remanded for resentencing in a case in which Livar pled guilty to failing to register as a sex offender in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). In Livar's plea agreement, the government reserved the right to change its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.