Adrian Sampson v. Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 15, 202423-15458California1,792 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 15 2024

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ADRIAN A. SAMPSON, No. 23-15458 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-02223-KJD-DJA v.

MEMORANDUM*

KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS

SOLUTIONS USA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Kent J. Dawson, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted March 4, 2024 Las Vegas, Nevada Before: M. SMITH, BENNETT, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Adrian Sampson appeals the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of Defendant Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc. on

his racial discrimination and retaliation claims under both Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. We have jurisdiction pursuant to

U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo.

Weil v. Citizens Telecom Servs. Co., LLC, 922 F.3d 993, 1001 (9th Cir. 2019). We

affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.