Biden

Defense for Children International-Palestine v. Biden

Good Law
107 F.4th 926
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 15, 202424-704California3,612 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEFENSE FOR CHILDREN No. 24-704

INTERNATIONAL-

D.C. No.

PALESTINE; AL-HAQ; AHMED

4:23-cv-05829-

ABU ARTEMA; MOHAMMED

JSW

AHMED ABU

ROKBEH; MOHAMMAD

HERZALLAH; LAILA OPINION

ELHADDAD; WAEIL

ELBHASSI; BASIM

ELKARRA; OMAR AL-NAJJAR,

Dr.; AYMAN NIJIM,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States; ANTONY J. BLINKEN, Secretary of State; LLOYD J. AUSTIN III, Secretary of Defense, in their official capacities,

Defendants - Appellees,

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California DEF. FOR CHILDREN INT’L-PALESTINE V. BIDEN

Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 10, 2024 San Francisco, California

Filed July 15, 2024

Before: Consuelo M. Callahan, Jacqueline H. Nguyen, and Daniel A. Bress, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion

SUMMARY*

Political Question Doctrine

The panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal, as not justiciable under the political question doctrine, of plaintiffs’ action seeking to enjoin the President and other senior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.