Cortez-Castro

Cortez-Castro v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 15, 202423-1224California484 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 15 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILSON RICARDO CORTEZ-CASTRO, No. 23-1224 Agency No. Petitioner, A062-160-044 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 11, 2024** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Wilson Ricardo Cortez-Castro, a native and citizen of El Salvador, seeks

review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the

denial of Cortez-Castro’s application for protection under the Convention Against

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and review for

substantial evidence the agency’s determination of Cortez-Castro’s eligibility for

CAT…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.