People v. Barroca CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 15, 2024B330144California2,148 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baltodano, J.

Filed 7/15/24 P. v. Barroca CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B330144 (Super. Ct. No. 18CR01674) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Santa Barbara County)

v.

GAIL EVELYN ADAMS

BARROCA,

Defendant and Appellant.

Gail Evelyn Adams Barroca appeals from an order denying her motion to withdraw her plea. She contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion and that her trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Barroca was charged with two counts of forgery against an elder by a caretaker after she forged checks and attempted to deposit them into her account (Pen. Code,1 § 368, subd. (e); counts 1 & 2). She was also charged with two…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.