Tye

Tye v. Tye CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 15, 2024E079807California1,064 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/15/24 Tye v. Tye CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

MATTHEW TYE,

Plaintiff, E079807

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1601882)

JUSTIN TYE et al., OPINION

Defendants and Respondents;

MYRON MATIKA et al.,

Interveners and Appellants.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Carol A. Greene, Judge.

Affirmed.

De Novo Law Firm and Benjamin A. Yrungaray for Interveners and Appellants.

No appearance for Plaintiff.

No appearance for Defendants and Respondents.

1 Interveners and appellants Myron and Mary Jane Matika (the Matikas) appeal the

denial of two motions to compel additional responses to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.