Hooman Automotive Group v. Glaser Weil Fink etc. CA2/3
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 7/15/24 Hooman Automotive Group v. Glaser Weil Fink etc. CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
HOOMAN AUTOMOTIVE B322256
GROUP, et al., (Los Angeles County Plaintiffs and Appellants, Super. Ct. No. 21STCV45057)
v.
GLASER WEIL FINK HOWARD
AVCHEN & SHAPIRO, LLP,
Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, William Fahey, Judge. Affirmed. Rosen Saba, Elizabeth L. Bradley; Esner, Chang, Boyer & Murphy, and Stuart B. Esner for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Nemecek & Cole, Claudia L. Stone, and Daniel L. Reback for Defendant and Respondent. Plaintiffs Hooman Nissani (Nissani) and his corporate entities HK Automotive Group, Inc. (HK), RHC Automotive, Inc. (RHC), and…