United States v. Diane Erdmann

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 16, 202422-30103California2,638 words

Opinion

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUL 16 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-30103

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:18-cr-00092-RAJ-2 v. Western District of Washington, Seattle DIANE RENEE ERDMANN, AKA Diane Renee, ORDER

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and McKEOWN and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

The memorandum disposition filed on June 17, 2024, is hereby amended.

The superseding amended memorandum disposition will be filed concurrently with

this order.

The Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. No further petitions for

rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 16 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-30102

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:18-cr-00092-RAJ-1 v.

BERNARD ROSS HANSEN, AKA…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.