United States v. Ali Hassan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 16, 202422-10321California1,097 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 16 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10321

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:18-cr-00219-PJH-1 v.

ALI MUGALLI HASSAN, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: HIGGINSON,*** MENDOZA, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Defendant Ali Hassan appeals his jury conviction on four counts:

(1) conspiracy to commit benefits fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371;

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Stephen A. Higginson, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation. (2) benefits fraud…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.