United States v. Bell
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 16 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-4084 D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 2:18-cr-00476-MWF-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
CHRISTOPHER GLENN BELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 12, 2024** Seattle, Washington
Before: McKEOWN, CLIFTON, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.
Christopher Glenn Bell appeals his 12-month sentence for violating
conditions of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Bell argues that the district court procedurally erred by basing his sentence
on “clearly erroneous facts,” specifically the district court’s “misapprehension” of