Athena Cosmetics, Inc. v. Amn Distribution, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 16, 202422-56178California769 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUL 16 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ATHENA COSMETICS, INC., a No. 22-56178 Delaware corporation, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 2:20-cv-05526-SVW-SHK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

AMN DISTRIBUTION, INC., a Delaware corporation; MOISHE NEWMAN, DBA Brush Express, an individual,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

MARINA LOUISE LANG; SOCAL IP

LAW GROUP, LLP,

Real-party-in-interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Submitted July 12, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and ANELLO,*** District Judge.

AMN Distribution, Inc. (AMN) and Moishe Newman appeal from the

district court’s order granting summary judgment to Athena Cosmetics, Inc. on its

breach of contract and trademark counterfeiting claims against AMN and Newman.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.