Martin

Martin v. Valtier CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 16, 2024A167676California2,863 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/16/24 Martin v. Valtier CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

DAVID MARTIN,

Plaintiff,

A167676

v. KRISTIN VALTIER, (Contra Costa County Super. Ct. No. D2200789) Defendant and Respondent;

MICHELLE WOODRUFF,

Real Party in Interest and Appellant

Michelle Woodruff appeals an order disqualifying her from representing plaintiff David Martin in this family law action and imposing sanctions. The basis of the order was that Woodruff communicated directly— and insultingly—to defendant Kristen Valtier, although Valtier was represented by counsel, in violation of Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of California, Rule 4.2 (Rule 4.2). We affirm the order.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The record before us contains…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.