Cortave

Cortave v. Oremor of Temecula, LLC CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 16, 2024D083290California4,374 words

Opinion

Opinion

Buchanan, J.

Filed 7/16/24 Cortave v. Oremor of Temecula, LLC CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

JONATHAN CORTAVE, D083290

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2022- 00009743-CU-FR-NC) OREMOR OF TEMECULA, LLC et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Earl H. Maas, III, Judge. Affirmed. Arentfox Schiff, Aaron H. Jacoby, John D. Bronstein and Gary D. Brophy for Defendants and Appellants. Dumbeck & Dumbeck, Jason D. Dumbeck and Curtis M. King for Plaintiff and Respondent. Jonathan Cortave filed this consumer action against vehicle dealership Oremor of Temecula, LLC (Oremor) and two other defendants. Based on a mandatory arbitration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.