Caro-Balderrama

Caro-Balderrama v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 17, 202423-2072California895 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 17 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JONATHAN CARO-BALDERRAMA, No. 23-2072 Agency No. Petitioner, A204-678-497 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 12, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: HIGGINSON, *** MENDOZA, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Jonathan Caro-Balderrama, a citizen of Mexico, appeals from a

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order, which dismissed his appeal of an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Stephen A. Higginson, United States Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, sitting by designation. order from an immigration judge (“IJ”) that denied his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.