People v. Casity CA3

Filed 7/17/24 P. v. Casity CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Amador) ----

THE PEOPLE, C097719

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 22CR31815)

v.

RICHARD DOUGLAS CASITY,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Richard Douglas Casity appeals from his convictions for stalking, stalking in violation of a court order, disobeying a domestic relations court order, and making criminal threats. According to Casity, he should have been convicted of only one count of stalking because both counts involved the same conduct. He further argues his punishment for the disobeying a domestic relations court order count should have been stayed under Penal Code section 654.1 Finally, Casity contends part of his sentence…