People v. Melara CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 17, 2024B330582California1,434 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/17/24 P. v. Melara CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

THE PEOPLE, B330582

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA427561) v.

OSKAR MELARA,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, David V. Herriford, Judge. Affirmed. Tanya Dellaca, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

________________________________ Defendant Oskar Melara appeals from an order resentencing him after remand from this court. His appellate counsel found no arguable issues to raise on appeal and filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.