United States v. Steven Duarte
108 F.4th 786
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 17, 202422-50048California3,008 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 17 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50048
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cr-00387-AB-1 Central District of California, v. Los Angeles
STEVEN DUARTE, AKA Shorty, ORDER
Defendant-Appellant.
MURGUIA, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)
and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.
FILED
JUL 17 2024
United States v. Duarte, No. 22-50048 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
VANDYKE, Circuit Judge, dissenting from the grant of rehearing en banc:
“What would you do if you were stuck in one place and every day was exactly
the same, and nothing that you did mattered?” In the Ninth Circuit, if a panel
upholds a party’s Second Amendment rights, it follows automatically that the case
will be taken en banc.…