Rundo

United States v. Rundo

Good Law
108 F.4th 792
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 202424-932California8,019 words

Opinion

Opinion

M. SMITH, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-932 D.C. Nos. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:18-cr-00759-

CJC-

v. 2:18-cr-00759-

CJC-

ROBERT RUNDO; ROBERT

2:18-cr-00759-

BOMAN,

CJC-

Defendants - Appellees.

OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Cormac J. Carney, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 18, 2024 Pasadena, California

Filed July 18, 2024

Before: RICHARD A. PAEZ and MILAN D. SMITH, JR., Circuit Judges, and JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. *

Opinion by Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr.

* The Honorable Jon S. Tigar, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. SUMMARY **

Criminal Law

The panel reversed the district court’s judgment dismissing, based on a claim of selective prosecution, an indictment charging Robert Paul Rundo and Robert Boman with conspiracy to violate the Anti-Riot Act as well as with substantively violating the Act; reinstated the indictment; and remanded the case for trial. The indictment alleges that Rundo is a founding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.