Rundo
United States v. Rundo
Opinion
Opinion
M. SMITH, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-932 D.C. Nos. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:18-cr-00759-
CJC-
v. 2:18-cr-00759-
CJC-
ROBERT RUNDO; ROBERT
2:18-cr-00759-
BOMAN,
CJC-
Defendants - Appellees.
OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Cormac J. Carney, Senior District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 18, 2024 Pasadena, California
Filed July 18, 2024
Before: RICHARD A. PAEZ and MILAN D. SMITH, JR., Circuit Judges, and JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. *
Opinion by Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr.
* The Honorable Jon S. Tigar, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. SUMMARY **
Criminal Law
The panel reversed the district court’s judgment dismissing, based on a claim of selective prosecution, an indictment charging Robert Paul Rundo and Robert Boman with conspiracy to violate the Anti-Riot Act as well as with substantively violating the Act; reinstated the indictment; and remanded the case for trial. The indictment alleges that Rundo is a founding…