A. H. v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 202423-1483California1,261 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 18 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

A.H., No. 23-1483 Agency No. Petitioner, A095-570-707 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted July 8, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, MENDOZA, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner seeks review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals

(BIA) affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of her applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

(CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. When, as here, the BIA

conducts its own review of the evidence and law rather than adopting the IJ’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. decision, “our review is limited to the BIA’s decision, except to the extent that the

IJ’s opinion is expressly adopted.”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.