A. H. v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 202423-1483California1,261 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 18 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
A.H., No. 23-1483 Agency No. Petitioner, A095-570-707 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted July 8, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: FRIEDLAND, MENDOZA, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner seeks review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals
(BIA) affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of her applications for asylum,
withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture
(CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. When, as here, the BIA
conducts its own review of the evidence and law rather than adopting the IJ’s
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. decision, “our review is limited to the BIA’s decision, except to the extent that the