Agk Sierra De Montserrat, L.P. v. Comerica Bank
Opinion
Opinion
VANDYKE, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AGK SIERRA DE MONTSERRAT, No. 23-15290
L.P.,
D.C. No. 2:15-cv- Plaintiff-Appellee, 01280-DAD-DB
v.
OPINION
COMERICA BANK,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 13, 2024 San Francisco, California
Filed July 19, 2024
Before: Eric D. Miller, Bridget S. Bade, and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge VanDyke; Concurrence by Judge Miller AGK SIERRA DE MONTSERRAT, L.P. V. COMERICA BANK
SUMMARY *
California Law / Attorneys’ Fees
The panel reversed the district court’s award of attorney fees associated with litigating a first-party breach of contract suit enforcing an indemnity provision, and remanded. The district court determined that Comerica Bank breached its agreement to indemnify AGK Sierra De Montserrat, L.P. (AGK) in two underlying lawsuits and awarded attorney fees incurred in those underlying actions. In addition, relying on DeWitt v. Western Pacific Railroad Co., 719 F.2d 1448 (9th Cir. 1983), the district court…