United States v. Reginald Thomas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 19, 202422-10284California1,203 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 19 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10284

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00216-JAM-2 v.

REGINALD LAMONT THOMAS, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 16, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: M. SMITH, BENNETT, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Reginald Thomas appeals from the district court’s decision to revoke his

supervised release. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.

In 2013, Thomas pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bank fraud and

aggravated identity theft. He was sentenced to 45 months of imprisonment and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). months…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.