O. L. v. County of Orange

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 19, 202423-55258California814 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 19 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

O. L., AKA, Jane Doe, No. 23-55258

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:20-cv-00322-JWH-GJS v.

COUNTY OF ORANGE; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John W. Holcomb, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 19, 2024**

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Jane Doe1, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s summary judgment

in Doe’s action challenging the conditions at the Women’s County Jail in Orange

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

1 The district court allowed appellant to proceed under a pseudonym in this case. County, California, where Doe was housed as a pretrial detainee. We have

jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.