Basilea Mena v. Robert Massie

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 19, 202422-16938California347 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 19 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BASILEA MENA, No. 22-16938

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:17-cv-00368-LCK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ROBERT MASSIE,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Lynnette C. Kimmins, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted July 19, 2024***

Before: WALLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Basilea Mena appeals pro se the district court’s judgment following a jury

trial in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Robert Massie, a City of Tucson police

officer. Mena alleged excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirm.

Mena is not entitled to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.