Basilea Mena v. Robert Massie
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 19, 202422-16938California347 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 19 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BASILEA MENA, No. 22-16938
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:17-cv-00368-LCK
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ROBERT MASSIE,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Lynnette C. Kimmins, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**
Submitted July 19, 2024***
Before: WALLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
Basilea Mena appeals pro se the district court’s judgment following a jury
trial in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Robert Massie, a City of Tucson police
officer. Mena alleged excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment. We
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirm.