Adventure Church v. City of Fresno CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 19, 2024F086428California12,972 words

Opinion

Opinion

Santos, J.

Filed 7/19/24 Adventure Church v. City of Fresno CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

ADVENTURE CHURCH, INC.,

F086428

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 22CECG04022) v.

CITY OF FRESNO, OPINION Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Jr., Judge. Lurie & Kramer, Barak Lurie and Luke Manzo for Plaintiff and Appellant. Tucker Ellis, Matt J. Fletcher, Douglas A. Hedenkamp; Aleshire & Wynder and Anthony R. Taylor for Defendant and Respondent City of Fresno. -ooOoo- Plaintiff Adventure Church, Inc. (Adventure Church or the church) sued defendant City of Fresno (city) for, among other things, intentional interference with contractual relationship (the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.