United States v. David Bunevacz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 22, 202422-50295California787 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 22 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50295

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:22-cr-00175-DSF-1 v.

DAVID JOSEPH BUNEVACZ, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 6, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: FORREST and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and DONATO,** District Judge.

David Bunevacz challenges his 210-month custodial sentence for securities

and wire fraud. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable James Donato, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. 1. Victim-Impact Statements. Bunevacz argues that the victim-impact

statements presented at sentencing were improper.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.