Khan
Khan v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 22, 202423-736California817 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
JUL 22 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SELIMA SHAHNAWAJ KHAN, No. 23-736
Petitioner, Agency No.
A201-195-269
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted July 18, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: WARDLAW, PAEZ, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Selima Shahnawaj Khan, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, seeks review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration
Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
1 protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction
under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.
“Where, as here, the BIA agrees with the IJ’s…