Hather Lemcke v. Martin O'Malley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 22, 202423-55720California748 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 22 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HATHER J. LEMCKE, No. 23-55720

AKA Heather J. Lemcke, D.C. No. 5:22-cv-01000-AS

Plaintiff-Appellant,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Alka Sagar, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 18, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: M. SMITH, BENNETT, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

An administrative law judge (“ALJ”) denied Heather Lemcke’s application

for disability insurance benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). this denial became the Commissioner’s final decision. The district court affirmed,

and Lemcke appeals. We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.