Garcia Arias v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 22, 202423-975California729 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 22 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIGUEL JORGE GARCIA ARIAS, No. 23-975 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-314-447 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 18, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, PAEZ, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Miguel Jorge Garcia Arias, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming the

Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his petitions for asylum, withholding of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo the legal question of

whether a particular social group…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.