Brian Netzel v. American Express Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 22, 202423-16083California1,273 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 22 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRIAN NETZEL; TRAVIS SMITH; ERIC No. 23-16083

LANGKAMP; NANCY LARSON,

individually, and on behalf of others D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01423-SMB similarly situated,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, MEMORANDUM*

v.

AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 12, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, GOULD, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Brian Netzel, Travis Smith, Eric Langkamp, and Nancy Larson (collectively,

“Appellants”) appeal a grant of a motion filed by American Express Company

(AmEx) to compel arbitration and dismiss Appellants’ complaint. Appellants

contend the arbitration agreements are unenforceable. Although AmEx’s arbitration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. policy includes a New York choice-of-law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.