Brian Netzel v. American Express Company
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 22, 202423-16083California1,273 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 22 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRIAN NETZEL; TRAVIS SMITH; ERIC No. 23-16083
LANGKAMP; NANCY LARSON,
individually, and on behalf of others D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01423-SMB similarly situated,
Plaintiffs-Appellants, MEMORANDUM*
v.
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 12, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: SCHROEDER, GOULD, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Brian Netzel, Travis Smith, Eric Langkamp, and Nancy Larson (collectively,
“Appellants”) appeal a grant of a motion filed by American Express Company
(AmEx) to compel arbitration and dismiss Appellants’ complaint. Appellants
contend the arbitration agreements are unenforceable. Although AmEx’s arbitration
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. policy includes a New York choice-of-law…