Sumontinee Sridej v. Antony Blinken
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 23, 202423-16021California904 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 23 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SUMONTINEE SRIDEJ, No. 23-16021
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00114-ART-BNW v.
ANTONY J. BLINKEN; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Respondents-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Anne R. Traum, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 8, 2024 Pasadena, California
Before: WARDLAW, CHRISTEN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.
In this extradition case, Appellant Sumontinee Sridej appeals the district
court’s order denying her petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241. She argues the district court erred by concluding that the extradition treaty
between Thailand and that the United States remains in force and that the fraud
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. charges brought by Thailand are extraditable offenses.1 “We review de novo the
district court’s denial of a habeas…