Sumontinee Sridej v. Antony Blinken

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 23, 202423-16021California904 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SUMONTINEE SRIDEJ, No. 23-16021

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00114-ART-BNW v.

ANTONY J. BLINKEN; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Respondents-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Anne R. Traum, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 8, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, CHRISTEN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

In this extradition case, Appellant Sumontinee Sridej appeals the district

court’s order denying her petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241. She argues the district court erred by concluding that the extradition treaty

between Thailand and that the United States remains in force and that the fraud

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. charges brought by Thailand are extraditable offenses.1 “We review de novo the

district court’s denial of a habeas…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.