Meeks
William Whitsitt v. Meeks
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 23, 202421-16636California361 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 23 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, No. 21-16636
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00016-TLN-CKD
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MEEKS, CLC Administrator; CITY OF
STOCKTON; CITY OF MANTECA; SAN
JOAQUIN COUNTY COURTS;
PLUMMER, Stockton Police Officer; SARA LIZERO, SJC Probation Control Unit; SAN
JOAQUIN COUNTY PROBATION
DEPARTMENT; CHRISTIAN LIFE
CHURCH; KINNEY, Security for CLC; NATHANIEL HANEY, Pastor CLC;
CHRISTIAN LIFE COLLEGE; LONG, SJC
Sheriff Deputy,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 16, 2024**
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: SCHROEDER, VANDYKE, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
The motion to recall the mandate (Docket…