Meeks

William Whitsitt v. Meeks

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 23, 202421-16636California361 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, No. 21-16636

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00016-TLN-CKD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MEEKS, CLC Administrator; CITY OF

STOCKTON; CITY OF MANTECA; SAN

JOAQUIN COUNTY COURTS;

PLUMMER, Stockton Police Officer; SARA LIZERO, SJC Probation Control Unit; SAN

JOAQUIN COUNTY PROBATION

DEPARTMENT; CHRISTIAN LIFE

CHURCH; KINNEY, Security for CLC; NATHANIEL HANEY, Pastor CLC;

CHRISTIAN LIFE COLLEGE; LONG, SJC

Sheriff Deputy,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 16, 2024**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: SCHROEDER, VANDYKE, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

The motion to recall the mandate (Docket…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.