William Whitsitt v. City of Stockton

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, No. 21-16774

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00131-KJM-AC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF STOCKTON; SAN JOAQUIN

COUNTY; FRIAD; OSCAR OCHOA;

PAUL BILLMAN; KELLY MORRIS;

NICKY MORRIS; JAYNE C. LEE; J.

NORTHUP, Judge; BECKY R. DIEL;

SHORE; MCKINLEY; SUPERIOR COURT

OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY; SAN

JOAQUIN COUNTY DISTRICT

ATTORNEY'S OFFICE; SAN JOAQUIN

COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT;

SHORE MCKINLEY CONGER LLP;

LIZARDO,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 16, 2024**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: SCHROEDER, VANDYKE, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

The motion to recall the mandate…