Larry Johnson v. Guardian Management

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 23, 202422-35775California397 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LARRY JOHNSON; MICHELLE HUME, No. 22-35775

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. Nos. 3:21-cv-00947-JR 3:21-cv-01439-JR v.

GUARDIAN MANAGEMENT; LISA MEMORANDUM*

SIMONSON; KELLY PAINE; THOMAS

BARRY BRENNEKE, Jr.; GUARDIAN

REAL ESTATE SERVICES; UPTOWN

TOWER APARTMENTS,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 16, 2024**

Before: SCHROEDER, VANDYKE, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Larry Johnson and Michelle Hume appeal pro se from the district court’s

judgment in their consolidated action alleging various claims under the Fair

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Housing Act (“FHA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.