Larry Johnson v. Guardian Management
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 23, 202422-35775California397 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 23 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LARRY JOHNSON; MICHELLE HUME, No. 22-35775
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. Nos. 3:21-cv-00947-JR 3:21-cv-01439-JR v.
GUARDIAN MANAGEMENT; LISA MEMORANDUM*
SIMONSON; KELLY PAINE; THOMAS
BARRY BRENNEKE, Jr.; GUARDIAN
REAL ESTATE SERVICES; UPTOWN
TOWER APARTMENTS,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 16, 2024**
Before: SCHROEDER, VANDYKE, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Larry Johnson and Michelle Hume appeal pro se from the district court’s
judgment in their consolidated action alleging various claims under the Fair
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Housing Act (“FHA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We…