Yan Sui v. Richard Marshack
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 23, 202423-55391California357 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 23 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
YAN SUI; PEI-YU YANG, No. 23-55391
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 8:13-cv-01607-JAK-KES
v.
MEMORANDUM*
RICHARD ALAN MARSHACK, an individual; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John A. Kronstadt, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 16, 2024**
Before: SCHROEDER, VANDYKE, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Yan Sui and Pei-Yu Yang appeal pro se from the district court’s orders
rejecting their post-judgment filings on the basis of a vexatious litigant order. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the
district court’s application of a vexatious litigant pre-filing order. In re Fillbach,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…