Yan Sui v. Richard Marshack

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 23, 202423-55391California357 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YAN SUI; PEI-YU YANG, No. 23-55391

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 8:13-cv-01607-JAK-KES

v.

MEMORANDUM*

RICHARD ALAN MARSHACK, an individual; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John A. Kronstadt, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 16, 2024**

Before: SCHROEDER, VANDYKE, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Yan Sui and Pei-Yu Yang appeal pro se from the district court’s orders

rejecting their post-judgment filings on the basis of a vexatious litigant order. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the

district court’s application of a vexatious litigant pre-filing order. In re Fillbach,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.