Salami

Salami v. Los Robles Regional Medical Center

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 23, 2024B327348California2,153 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baltodano, J.

Filed 7/1/24; certified for publication 7/23/24 (order attached)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

FARZAM SALAMI, 2d Civil No. B327348 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2021- Plaintiff and Appellant, 00560715-CU-BC-VTA) (Ventura County) v.

LOS ROBLES REGIONAL

MEDICAL CENTER,

Defendant and Respondent.

Farzam Salami appeals from the trial court’s orders sustaining Los Robles Regional Medical Center’s demurrers to claims in his first and third amended complaints (FAC and TAC, respectively) without granting leave to amend. Salami contends the court erred when it: (1) sustained the demurrer to the breach of contract and declaratory relief claims in his FAC after finding that Los Robles’s emergency services fee (EMS fee) was for services that were “actually rendered,” and (2) sustained the demurrer to the unfair competition law (UCL; Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.), Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA; Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq.), and declaratory relief claims in his TAC after concluding that Los Robles had no duty to disclose its intent to charge an EMS fee. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.