Liddy

United States v. Liddy

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 24, 202423-3654California402 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-3654 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:19-cr-01685-CAB -1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

RAYMOND LIDDY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Cathy Ann Bencivengo, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 16, 2024**

Before: SCHROEDER, VANDYKE, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Raymond Liddy appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking

probation and imposing a 24-month sentence. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Liddy contends that there was insufficient evidence to revoke probation

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). because the government did not establish that his statements constituted

transmission of threats in interstate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.