Valdez

Valdez v. Oregon Federal District Court

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 24, 202424-1676California424 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE GUADALUPE VALDEZ, No. 24-1676 D.C. No. 3:23-cv-01814-MC Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

OREGON FEDERAL DISTRICT

COURT; DOJ - OFFICE OF THE UNITED

STATES ATTORNEY,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 16, 2024**

Before: SCHROEDER, VANDYKE, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Jose Guadalupe Valdez appeals1 pro se from the district court’s order

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Appellant is not required to pay fees for this appeal because the district court found appellant to be indigent. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is therefore unnecessary. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). denying his petition for a writ of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.