White

United States v. White

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 24, 202424-529California320 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-529 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:13-cr-00337-WBS-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAUL DOUGLAS WHITE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 16, 2024**

Before: SCHROEDER, VANDYKE, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Paul Douglas White appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed upon his

second revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, and we affirm.

White contends that the district court erred by imposing a term of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). imprisonment instead of placing him in a residential treatment program to address

his mental health and substance abuse…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.