Jackson v. Faraday & Future CA2/3
Opinion
Opinion
Egerton, J.
Filed 7/24/24 Jackson v. Faraday & Future CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
MARISSA JACKSON, B328046
Plaintiff and Respondent, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 22STCV34852 v.
FARADAY & FUTURE, INC.,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael L. Stern, Judge. Affirmed.
Vedder Price, Sheryl L. Skibbe, Charlie Y. Wang and Gabrielle Mercurio for Defendant and Appellant.
Diana Gevorkian Law Firm and Diana Gevorkian for Plaintiff and Respondent. _________________________ Marissa Jackson sued her employer, Faraday & Future, Inc. (Faraday), for various employment-related claims. Faraday moved to compel arbitration under an agreement Jackson signed as a…