Garcia

Garcia v. Bowman CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 24, 2024G063062California5,376 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/24/24 Garcia v. Bowman CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

FRANZ CHRISTIAN GARCIA,

Plaintiff and Respondent, G063062

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2023- 01319398)

JAKE BOWMAN,

OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Melissa R. McCormick, Judge. Affirmed. Gilbert & Sackman, Joshua F. Young, Benjamin M. O’Donnell and Mitzi Marquez-Avila for Defendant and Appellant. Theodora Oringher, Antony Buchignani, Adam Wentland and Lindley G. Round for Plaintiff and Respondent. Jake Bowman appeals from the trial court’s order denying his special motion to strike based on the anti-SLAPP statute. (Code Civ. Proc., 1 § 425.16.) He was sued for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.