Lindsay Okonowsky v. Merrick Garland
Opinion
Opinion
WARDLAW, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LINDSAY OKONOWSKY, No. 23-55404
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-07581- v. VAP-AS
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, United States Attorney OPINION General,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 8, 2024 Pasadena, California
Filed July 25, 2024
Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Morgan Christen, and Mark J. Bennett, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Wardlaw SUMMARY*
Title VII / Hostile Work Environment
The panel reversed the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the government in a sex discrimination action, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, filed by plaintiff, a staff psychologist in a federal prison, alleging that the Bureau of Prisons failed to take adequate measures to address a hostile work environment at the prison. The panel held that the district court erred by considering only some of the evidence, and by applying…