People v. Smith CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 25, 2024C096806California3,540 words

Opinion

Opinion

Duarte, J.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Factual Background The factual basis of defendant’s plea stated as follows: “[O]n April 20th, 2021, the defendant and [B.D.] were in a dating relationship and resided together in Sacramento. They argued and defendant attacked [B.D.] The attack included strangulation of [B.D.] and slamming her head into a wall. [B.D.] lost consciousness as a result of the assault and was later diagnosed with a concussion.” Defendant’s Plea On November 24, 2021, the trial court set out the parties’ agreement that defendant would plead no contest to one count of inflicting corporal injury resulting in a traumatic condition on B.D., with whom he had a dating relationship (Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a); count eight), and admit the enhancement allegation that he inflicted great bodily injury upon B.D. under circumstances involving domestic violence (id., § 12022.7, subd. (e)).1 The court noted that it “would impose the upper term [on count eight] of four years, impose the low term on the enhancement of three years, consecutive, for an aggregate term of seven years in state prison. That seven-year state prison will be suspended. [Defendant] will be placed on five years formal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.