Jimenez

Jimenez v. Patino CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 25, 2024F086599California19,591 words

Opinion

Opinion

Smith, J.

Filed 7/25/24 Jimenez v. Patino CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

FEDERICO D. JIMENEZ et al.,

F086599

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 20CV0415) v.

JOSE PATINO et al., OPINION Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kings County. Valerie R. Chrissakis, Judge. Kahn, Soares & Conway, Jan L. Kahn, Rissa A. Stuart, and Hunter W. Swearingen for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Dias Law Firm, Jonette M. Montgomery and Ella R. Floresca for Defendants and Respondents. -ooOoo- This matter relates to a dispute between two neighboring landowners, the Jimenez family and the Patino family. The Jimenez family and the Patino family own neighboring agricultural properties in Riverdale in Kings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.