United States v. Sabino Ramos

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 25, 202422-10166California929 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 25 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10166

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:21-cr-00210-JLT-SKO-1 v.

SABINO RAMOS, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jennifer L. Thurston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 25, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: BEA, HAMILTON,*** and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** We stayed oral argument for this case pending the outcome of United States v. Lucas, 101 F.4th 1158 (9th Cir. 2024) (en banc). With Lucas now decided, we conclude that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record, such that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. We therefore submit this case concurrently with the filing of this memorandum. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.