Armida Ruelas v. County of Alameda
108 F.4th 1208
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 26, 202421-16528California1,608 words
Opinion
Opinion
Sidney R. Thomas, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARMIDA RUELAS; DE’ANDRE No. 21-16528
EUGENE COX; BERT DAVIS;
KATRISH JONES; JOSEPH D.C. No. MEBRAHTU; DAHRYL LAMONT 4:19-cv-07637-
REYNOLDS; MONICA MASON; JST
LUIS NUNEZ-ROMERO; SCOTT
ABBEY,
OPINION
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA;
GREGORY J. AHERN; ARAMARK
CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC,
Defendants-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jon S. Tigar, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 17, 2022 Submission Withdrawn November 1, 2022 Resubmitted June 11, 2024 San Francisco, California Filed July 26, 2024
Before: Sidney R. Thomas and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges, and George H. Wu, * District Judge.
Opinion by Judge Sidney R. Thomas
SUMMARY **
Detainees/Minimum Wage
The panel reversed the district court’s order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss claims brought by a putative class of non-convicted individuals who work or worked without pay for a private company, Aramark Correctional Services, LLC…