Samra

Samra v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 26, 202423-1504California941 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 26 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BOOTA SINGH SAMRA, No. 23-1504 Agency No. Petitioner, A077-432-096 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted July 19, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: M. SMITH, BENNETT, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Boota Singh Samra, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of a

decision from the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal

from several orders of an immigration judge (“IJ”) (collectively, the “Agency”).

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1). We deny the petition.

In 2000, an IJ granted Samra’s first asylum application. In 2003, the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) investigated Samra’s former law firm

for filing fraudulent asylum applications. In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.