Aguilar Peralta v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 26, 202422-1609California917 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 26 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIO AGUILAR PERALTA, No. 22-1609 Agency No. Petitioner, A095-657-860 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Department of Homeland Security

Submitted May 14, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: COLLINS, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Julio Cesar Aguilar Peralta, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of a determination by an immigration judge (“IJ”) under 8 C.F.R.

§ 1208.31(g)(1) that he does not have a reasonable fear of persecution or torture in

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Mexico and is therefore not entitled to relief from a reinstated order of removal.

“We review the IJ’s determination that the [noncitizen] did not establish…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.